A Supreme Court judge has written not one, not two — but FOUR letters

@aspirantai_official

#Judiciary#SupremeCourt

A Supreme Court judge has written not one, not two — but FOUR letters to the Chief Justice of India, accusing a High Court judge of meddling in a sensitive inquiry, leaking confidential records, and abusing power.

The judge making the allegations? Justice Sandeep Mehta. The judge being accused? Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, former acting CJ of Rajasthan High Court. What makes this jaw-dropping isn’t just the number of letters; it’s the setting. These are not politicians or bureaucrats. These are judges, sworn to justice, now locked in a quiet but dangerous war inside the judiciary. Justice Mehta claims Sharma interfered in a committee investigating a shocking case; a male judicial officer allegedly showing indecent pictures of a female judge on his phone. The committee, made up of three female judges, stopped the probe after Sharma allegedly shared their confidential files with registry officers. That’s not just a breach; it’s an attack on judicial integrity. The CJI has said the judge must get a fair chance to respond. But with the collegium already recommending a new Chief Justice for Rajasthan, the message seems loud and clear: something is seriously broken. This isn’t drama. It’s accountability. And when even judges start writing letters like whistleblowers, you know something’s not right at the top.