But for MPs, it’s a lifeline; especially in far-flung constituencies. When Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra was allegedly kicked out at 11 PM; after being allotted a room; it wasn’t just rude. It became a constitutional question. The Supreme Court is now deciding if such a personal grievance can even be heard directly under Article 32. Why does this matter? Because if MPs can’t rely on basic state facilities, what does that say about democracy’s functioning at ground level? The Solicitor General is pushing back, warning this could open floodgates; MPs could come to SC for every inconvenience. Yet, Moitra’s team says this isn’t just about a room. It’s about parliamentary privilege, federalism, and whether elected reps can do their job without being harassed. The real question? When governance turns personal, who protects the people’s voice?