Article 81(2)(a) says a state’s voice in Parliament must reflect *only* its population. But that ignores half the story: who actually funds the Union. Maharashtra, with 9% of India’s people, pays 22% of GST. Bihar, with 9%, pays 2%. A fair Parliament shouldn’t just represent who spends, but who pays. What if seats were split 50-50 between population and tax contribution? Maharashtra jumps from 48 to 84 seats. UP falls from 80 to 65. Tamil Nadu stays at 39. This isn’t about buying votes; it’s about recognizing economic reality. Our Finance Commission already uses 10+ factors to divide money. Why does Parliament still use just one? The debate we’re having is a distraction. The one we’re avoiding could reshape Indian federalism.