The party claimed their social media handles were blocked without notice, reason, or hearing; a move they called unconstitutional. Represented by senior lawyer Shadan Farasat, AAP argued that shutting down entire accounts (not just posts) is a dangerous form of prior restraint on free speech. The court agreed; at least for now; and asked Meta to restore access, with a condition: any allegedly objectionable posts must be removed. But here’s what’s interesting: no specific content was ever flagged before the block. That’s unusual. And it’s exactly why the court is treating this as more than just a tech tussle; it’s about democracy. If an opposition party can be silenced without explanation, what’s stopping it from happening again? The full case is set for hearing in two weeks. This isn’t just about AAP Gujarat. It’s about every political voice online.