That’s a big deal. In a case from Azamgarh, UP, six people were initially named in an FIR but left out of the chargesheet. Later, they were dragged back into trial; and challenged it. The Allahabad HC dismissed their plea in just two pages, 15 sentences, no real reasoning. SC said: that’s not how justice works. Even if courts are overloaded, you can’t skip the ‘why’. A verdict without reasoning isn’t just lazy; it’s dangerous. It blocks appeals, hides bias, and leaves people hanging. This isn’t about one case. It’s about the soul of our judiciary: that every decision must speak, not just conclude. For law aspirants, exam takers, or anyone who believes in fair play; this is a lesson worth remembering.